What Is a Zero Torque Putter? Pros, Cons & Who It Suits
Watch any putting green this year and you will spot them: putters with the shaft planted in the middle of the head, faces that sit ahead of the grip, shapes that look more like drafting tools than flatsticks. The phrase behind all of it is zero torque, and in about two seasons it has gone from niche curiosity to the fastest growing corner of the putter market.
This guide eplains what the term actually means, where the design came from, what independent testing shows, and who genuinely stands to benefit. One note before we start: MG Golf sells golf balls, gloves and rangefinders rather than putters, so treat this as a no strings explainer of the biggest equipment story on the greens.
The Problem Zero Torque Putters Try To Solve
Torque is just a twisting force. On a conventional putter, the shaft enters near the heel while most of the head's weight sits away from that connection point, so the face naturally wants to fan open on the backswing and snap closed through impact. Delivering a square face at the exact moment of contact becomes a timing exercise, and timing is the first thing to wobble over a nervy putt from three feet.
Putter makers have managed that twist for decades rather than removing it. Blades with toe hang suit players who swing on an arc and rotate the face. Face balanced mallets suit straighter strokes. Both still rotate once the club is in motion, though. A zero torque putter takes a third path: the shaft axis runs straight through the head's center of gravity, so the head has little built in urge to rotate at all. Balance one on your finger and the toe points at the sky instead of drooping toward the ground.
Where The Trend Came From
The modern movement started with L.A.B. Golf, a small company out of Eugene, Oregon, whose name stands for Lie Angle Balance. Its early putters looked strange, placed the face slightly ahead of the shaft, and often shipped with grips that build in a forward press, but the concept found believers one demo at a time. Axis1 had been selling putters on similar physics even earlier, with Justin Rose as its most famous convert.
Tour results poured fuel on it. Adam Scott adopted a long L.A.B. model years ago, Lucas Glover's back to back wins in August 2023 turned heads, and by late 2024 Bettinardi, PXG and Odyssey had entered the category, with TaylorMade, Scotty Cameron and Ping following in 2025. Then J.J. Spaun holed a 64 foot putt at Oakmont with a L.A.B. DF3, the first major won with a zero torque putter, and the design officially stopped being a curiosity.
What 50,000 Putts Say
The most useful public data on the category comes from MyGolfSpy's 2026 Most Wanted putter testing, which covered more than 50,000 putts across 79 putters: 26 zero torque models, 29 mallets and 24 blades, all scored with a PuttView system where a more negative number is better. The zero torque group averaged minus 6.29. Mallets averaged minus 3.99, and blades finished at minus 2.65, so the category gap was not subtle.
The distance splits are more interesting than the headline. At 20 feet the three groups sat within about two strokes of one another, but at 12 feet blades were the only category that scored worse than the testing baseline while zero torque models averaged minus 3.30, a gap of nearly five strokes on a very common putt length. Only one of the 53 conventional putters in the field, the Bettinardi BB 6.0, matched the zero torque category average, and the best individual score belonged to an Odyssey Square 2 Square model at minus 8.1. The year before, the same testing program measured a seven stroke spread between its best zero torque putter and its weakest blade.
MG Senior Golf Balls
Built for golfers looking for a higher launch, hotter feel and more distance, particularly when driver distance is under 250 yards.
- Designed for extra distance
- 350-dimple, 2-piece construction
- Durable Surlyn cover
- Available in white or optic yellow
DynaGrip Elite
A lightweight premium Cabretta leather glove made for golfers who value soft feel, grip feedback and comfort.
- Soft premium Cabretta leather
- Thin construction for better feel
- Elastic knuckle hinge for comfort
- Men's, cadet and women's sizing
MG600S Laser Rangefinder
A compact 6X rangefinder with slope-adjusted yardages, pin-lock confirmation and an external LCD display.
- Measures from 6 to 600+ yards
- MG-Lock pin targeting technology
- Slope-adjusted distance mode
- 6X magnification and external LCD
The Fine Print On The Data
It helps to know what those numbers measure. Testers hit hundreds of putts from five, 10 and 20 feet while the PuttView system tracks direction, speed and proximity, then converts everything into a handicap style score against a baseline. That is a controlled indoor surface with perfect reads handed to the player. It says a lot about start line and pace consistency, and nothing about reading a bumpy green in a two club wind.
The averages also hide how differently individuals respond. Within the same test pool, the best putter in the group spread barely a stroke and a half across the three categories, while another strong putter jumped from minus 6.09 with blades to minus 10.97 with zero torque, a swing of nearly five strokes. Both improved, but one improved roughly four times as much. Category data describes the group. It does not promise your result.
The Skeptics Have Receipts Too
The equipment industry itself is split on how far this goes. Jacob Davidson, the Callaway executive who oversees Odyssey's putter strategy, has noted that roughly 40 percent of putter sales at big box retailers this year have been zero torque models, yet he calls it a trend not driven by tour success, with maybe 10 percent of a given tour field using one. His blunt summary: "zero torque makes bad putters better." The president of Titleist's club division has gone further, suggesting the market has overreacted and the design ultimately fits about one golfer in 10.
The scoreboard backs up some of that caution. Four of the first five PGA Tour wins of 2026 came with TaylorMade Spider Tour X models, conventional mallets that are bucking the zero torque trend on tour, and six of the world's top 10 currently putt with a Spider of some kind. Across all of 2025, the L.A.B. DF3 was the only zero torque model to win on tour, although it picked a good week to do it at the U.S. Open.
Who Should Actually Try One
The design helps most where the face misbehaves. Golfers who miss in both directions, get twitchy under pressure, rarely practice putting or never developed much face awareness are the natural fits, which is exactly why the category is selling to everyday players faster than it is spreading on tour. The fit is less obvious for players with a grooved arc stroke and years on heavy toe hang blades: one GolfPass equipment tester found his strokes with natural arc tended to push putts with these designs, and that feel can suffer when the shaft enters the head so close to the impact point.
Testing one costs nothing. Balance your current putter on a finger, then balance a zero torque model next to it and watch the toe point skyward. Roll both against each other from five, 10 and 20 feet, counting makes inside four feet and leave distance on the long ones, and give the newcomer a full week for the different address view and any press grip to stop feeling alien. The logic is the same as deciding whether a club fitting is worth booking: let measured results, not marketing, make the call.
What A Zero Torque Putter Will Not Fix
A square face only helps a putt that starts on a good line at a good speed. No head design reads break, and none will rescue a stroke that decelerates, which is why adjusting your pace on slow and fast greens remains the highest value putting skill a golfer can build. Plenty of three putts blamed on the putter are really pace errors wearing a disguise.
Price and feel deserve a sanity check too. Flagship zero torque models commonly run $400 to $500, although a wave of newer entries has pushed real options down near $200 from brands like PXG, Wilson and Tour Edge. And keep your ball constant while you test, because construction changes what contact sounds and feels like off any putter face: our explainer on how compression changes feel off the putter covers why two putters can seem different when the real variable was the ball.
So, Does It Actually Work?
The honest answer is yes, with an asterisk. The physics is real, the category level testing gap is the most lopsided the putter world has produced in years, and the golfers this design targets, the ones fighting the face, tend to see the biggest jumps. At the same time, individual response varies widely, elite putters keep winning with conventional mallets and blades, and no putter has ever read a green.
So treat zero torque the way tour players treat every club: as a candidate that has to earn its spot. Try one against your gamer, judge it over a month of real rounds on makes inside four feet and total three putts, and keep the ball, the routine and the practice honest while you do. If the strange looking putter wins that audition, the label on the shaft stops mattering, because the scorecard already voted.
